Security and Innovation
Webconferences: Technologies used for urban security
In 2018, Efus set up a working group on Security & Innovation that seeks to harness the opportunities of smart and hyper connected cities to improve crime prevention and urban security. The purpose is to share prospective reflections and insights on innovative strategies and technologies that can be applied to urban security.
Given that new technologies are bound to rapidly expand it is particularly important that local authorities exchange on their advantages and limitations applied to their specific local context and local population’s needs while ensuring that fundamental freedoms are respected. In order to promote the exchange of experiences amongst peers, Efus is launching a new series of web conferences on new technologies in urban security.
Predictive Policing – A tool to forecast crime or to support decision making?
- 25 June, 11:00 CEST
Intelligence-led policing has been employed before the advent of artificial intelligence and big data. However, developments in computing power and the digitization of information have greatly facilitated access to large amounts of data. This enables law enforcement agencies to speed up the process of collecting and analysing data and develop predictive policing methods. Using data and statistical methods allows to “forecast” the probability of crime, both in terms of potential crime locations and individuals that might be involved in criminal activities – as victims or as perpetrators.
Predictive policing methods, which some criticize as decision-making tools based on limited data and potential machine bias, have been used for a while now in the United States. In Europe, they are still relatively new. For instance, in Germany, six federal states have applied them in different ways since 2014 and the Netherlands have implemented predictive policing at national level since 2017. It seems that until now, the main impact has been linked to internal processes within Law Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) and a better understanding of how data are selected and used.
At a time when trust in the police is strained by racial profiling and disproportionate use of force, it is important to understand what type of predictive policing methods are being and can be used in Europe and how ethical concerns are addressed. In the framework of the EU’s Cutting Crime Impact (CCI) project, researchers have reviewed the state of the art of predictive policing in EU countries and analysed its ethical, legal and social impacts. In our upcoming webconferences, we invite you to learn about the uses of predictive policing in Europe from the CCI project research experience and exchange on the method’s effectiveness and implications. More specifically, we will look at questions such as:
- What type of predictive policing methods have been applied in Europe?
- How effective are they? What success factors should be measured?
- What are the ethical, social and legal implications of predictive policing?
- In which ways can ethical concerns – notably in terms of explicit and implicit bias in data – be mitigated?
- Maximilian Querbach, LKA – State Office of Criminal Investigation of Lower Saxony
- Dr. Oskar Gstrein, University of Groningen
- Guenter Okon, Institute for Pattern Based Forecasting (IfmPt), Precobs-Predictive Policing made in Germany
Civic technologies for urban security: what cooperation between citizens, police and local authorities?
- 21 July, 11:00 CEST
>> REGISTRATION <<
The concept of civic technology refers to the use of technology to facilitate citizen participation in various government tasks with the aim of improving the quality of public services. This can be done through websites, online platforms and mobile applications. Civic technology can be used to inform citizens, facilitate access to services, but also to directly involve them in policy making and implementation.
In the field of public security, citizens are often involved through social media in their various forms: platforms, networks, applications or messaging services. Citizen participation is particularly visible at the local level, for example when community police officers collect information by engaging with local residents. It is often a bottom-up process in which citizens take the initiative. They create online platforms to facilitate access to information about some aspects of their city’s security. They collect and analyse data, organise neighbourhood surveillance, and sometimes go so far as directly investigating crimes at local and even international level. Sometimes, they use social media to establish police watchdogs, promote transparency and denounce police misconduct.
The use of these kinds of platforms can have both a positive and negative impact on urban security. It can improve communication between security stakeholders and citizens and thus help to better tailor responses to the situation on the ground, but it can also blur the line between legitimate and self-proclaimed security actors. This in turn increases the risk of privacy breach and vigilantism, which can have negative effects on social cohesion.
The following questions will be discussed:
- What forms of civic technology in urban security exist in European cities?
- What are the benefits and risks of civic technology ?
- Does it contribute to co-producing public security? Are crime prevention stakeholders involved?
- How to prevent the risks posed by vigilantism?
- Daniel Trottier, PhD, Associate Professor, Dept. of Media & Communication, Erasmus School of History, Culture and Communication TBC
>> Find the working group on EfusNetwork here (members only)
>> Pilar de la Torre, programme manager, email@example.com
The project CCI is financed 100% by the Horizon 2020 Security Research Programme of the European Commission