The project’s main objective is to rethink, redesign and adapt existing tools and methods to help local security actors anticipate and better respond to security challenges in the context of:

• A decline in citizens’ trust in institutions, local elected officials and other security and prevention actors;
• Drastic budgetary cuts and various contemporary crises that affect local and national authorities;
• The development of smart cities, which implies the efficient inclusion of technological innovations in crime prevention.

IcARUS will focus on four areas that have been identified by local and regional authorities as enduring security challenges :

1. Preventing juvenile delinquency;
2. Preventing radicalisation leading to violent extremism;
3. Designing and managing safe public spaces;
4. Preventing and reducing trafficking and organised crime.

These will also be examined in the light of four cross-cutting issues of:

• governance and diversification of actors,
• technological change,
• gender,
• transnational & cross-border issues.

The project will review and reassess past and present urban security policies to provide socially and technologically innovative strategies and tools adaptable to specific local contexts.

We will develop custom-made solutions to security challenges, which will incorporate social as well as technological innovations.

The tools will be designed through a constant process of defining, ideating, prototyping, testing, evaluating and adapting by local authorities. This process will ensure that they are effective and meet the collective needs of citizens.

A Consultative Committee of Cities and law enforcement agencies (LEA’s)  supports the implementation of the project. The Committee provides consortium partners with practitioner perspectives and feedback. The Committee thus supports the design and implementation of the tools developed in the project. It has a key role in strengthening multi-level governance and local partnerships. It is also expected to be a central channel of communication and dissemination of the toolkit and the overall results of the project.

A greater involvement of cities will allow more end users to benefit from the tools and methods developed in the context of the project, throughout its course.

• City of Malmö (SE)
• City of Mechelen (BE)
• Region of Emilia-Romagna (IT)
• City of Gdansk (PL)
• Departament d’Interior – Generalitat Catalunya (ES)

Barbara Holtmann, Director, Fixed.Africa and non-executive President of the Board, Women in Cities International

Laetitia Wolff, Design Impact Consultant, Besign, The Sustainable Design School in Nice

Thierry Charlois, Night Policy Project Manager, Paris City Council

Tim Chapman, Chair of the board of the European Forum for Restorative Justice

Patrick Charlier, Director – Unia

Design Thinking Methodology in the context of the IcARUS Project -Factsheet #1

This factsheet is based on research conducted for the IcARUS reports “Methodology for the adoption of DT in urban security & crime prevention initiatives” (D1.1) and “Guidelines to the DT implementation in IcARUS task” (D1.2).

Prevention of Juvenile Delinquency: relevant international and national regulations – Factsheet #2

This factsheet is based on research conducted for the IcARUS report “Legal adjustment report of IcARUS to the relevant international and national regulations” (D6.1).

Using research to inform urban security strategies – Factsheet #3

This factsheet is based on research conducted by IcARUS for the public report “The Changing Face of Urban Security Research” (D2.1), and it further communicates how can research inform the urban security strategies.

Learning from the past: 30 years of crime prevention and urban security – Factsheet #4

This factsheet is based on research conducted by IcARUS for the public report “The Changing Face of Urban Security Research” (D2.1), and it further communicates how can research inform the urban security strategies.

Investing in Prevention Time to Embrace the Research Evidence – Factsheet #5

This factsheet is based on research conducted by IcARUS for the public report “The Changing Face of Urban Security Research” (D2.1), and it further communicates how can research inform the urban security strategies.

Spotlight on Preventing Radicalisation leading to Violent Extremism- Factsheet #6

This factsheet is based on research conducted by IcARUS for the public report D2.1 The Changing Face of Urban Security Research, and it further communicates the learnings related to prevention of radicalization leading to violent extremism.

Spotlight on Preventing and Reducing Trafficking and Organised Crime – Factsheet #7

This factsheet is based on research conducted by IcARUS for the public report D2.1 The Changing Face of Urban Security Research, and it further communicates the learnings related to prevention for reducing traffickind and organized crime, and improving Urban Security.

Spotlight on preventing Juvenile Delinquency – Factsheet #8

This factsheet is based on research conducted by IcARUS for the public report D2.1 The Changing Face of Urban Security Research, and it further communicates the learnings related to prevention of juvenile delinquency for improving Urban Security.

Spotlight on Designing and Managing Safe Public Spaces – Factsheet #9

This factsheet is based on research conducted by IcARUS for the public report D2.1 The Changing Face of Urban Security Research, and it further communicates the learnings related to designing and managing safe urban spaces for improving Urban Security.

July 2022

• State of the Art Review and Key Lessons
• Lisbon IcARUS Local Workshop – “Help create innovative solutions for your city!”

May 2022

• Design Thinking with IcARUS: How to ensure effective multi-stakeholder partnerships?

November 2021

• Rethinking Crime Prevention: IcARUS at Efus’ Security, Democracy, and Cities Conference
• The Evolution of Innovative Approaches to Build More Secure and Safer Public Spaces
• Engagement and Communication: An update on the State of the Art Review

September 2021

• IcARUS Panel Session at the European Police Congress in Berlin

May 2021

• Do you speak IcARUS? Why the project has created a common glossary of terms
• Design Thinking virtual training workshops: A fun and fruitful experience
• How IcARUS is leading innovation for urban security
• Consultative Committee of Cities Interview – Werner Van Herle
• Expert Advisory Board Interview – Dr. Barbara Holtmann

April 2021

• Framework of Rules of Ethics of Criminological Research. In the light of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
• Urban Crime – An International Journal

February 2021

• Understanding the needs and expectation of the project’s six partner cities: a research conducted by the University of Leeds
• Thinking out of the box: How the Design Thinking innovative approach shapes the project
• Turin: Juvenile Delinquency is a priority
• Stuttgart: remaining safe at a time of fundamental changes
• Riga: a holistic approach to the security of public spaces
• Rotterdam: an open window to the world
• Nice: pioneering new urban security solutions
• Community policing in Lisbon – Sustainable local partnerships for safer neighbourhoods

December 2020

• Ensuring that IcARUS complies with high ethical and legal standards
• Testing, implementation and evaluation of the tools
• Urban Security in the last 30 years: an upcoming in-depth analysis
• Combining methodology and innovation: the IcARUS approach
• Welcome to The IcARUS Project

Sign up for IcARUS’ newsletter and find all the previous newsletters here.

Under review:

• Results from Cross-Training Task
• Methodology for the Adoption of Design Thinking in Urban Security and Crime Prevention Initiatives
• Guidelines to the Design Thinking implementation in IcARUS task
• Visual Identity
• Strategic Dissemination and Communication plan. V1
• Creation of the project’s webpage and social networks
• Project Management Guide
• Risk Management and Quality Assurance Plan

Efus is the coordinator of the IcARUS project.

Project Coordinator:
Efus

Local authorities:
City of Stuttgart (DE), City of Riga (LV), City of Rotterdam (NL), City of Nice (FR), City of Lisbon (PT), City of Turin (IT)

Universities and research partners:
Salzburg University of Applied Sciences (AT), Erasmus University of Rotterdam (NL), Panteion University (GR), University of Salford (UK), University of Leeds (UK), IDIAP Research Institute (CH), KEMEA (ES)

Civil society and private sector organisations:
Plus Ethics (ES), Makesense (FR), Camino (DE)

Dissemination and Communication
LOBA (PT)

Co-producing social and technological innovations to address urban security challenges: Join the IcARUS web conferences and contribute to rethinking urban security approaches

Initiating transformation in urban security policies – About the IcARUS project

With the aim of supporting transformation in urban security policies, Efus launched the IcARUS project to integrate innovative methodologies and foresight into urban security approaches, mobilising socially and technologically innovative solutions and the participation of all relevant stakeholders, including citizens. The IcARUS project, funded by the European Union and implemented in cooperation with 18 partners including universities and research institutions, local authorities, civil society and private sector organisations, draws on the accumulation of knowledge and insights from 30 years of urban security research, practice and policies. 

Designing urban security approaches that are centred around citizens’ needs

IcARUS’ partner cities are developing tools which respond to their local urban security challenges and take  citizens’ needs into account. Accompanying the development of concrete tools, IcARUS seeks to enhance a strategic approach to urban security. To achieve this objective, Efus and its partners invite experts to support cities  in integrating cross-cutting urban security  issues in the development of their tools. 

How? This will be done through the organisation of a series of web conferences, in which cities’ experiences are at the heart of each session, covering diverse topics, including the integration of gender in security policies, the rethinking of urban security problems and solutions, and the involvement of citizens in the management of public spaces.

Are you part of a local authority? Join us and contribute to improving  innovative approaches to urban security! 

This will support the creation of tailor-made, comprehensive and inclusive tools, to make sure they are best adapted to the reality of local contexts.

Session 1

📆 11^th January 2023 (2pm CET)

Gender mainstreaming in urban security policies intends to integrate an equality perspective at all stages and levels of urban policies, security strategies and interventions. 

Men, women and people of all genders are confronted with different security issues in urban environments. Men are more vulnerable to violence and robbery, while women are more likely to experience sexual harassment and gender-based violence. These differences concern a variety  of issues, for example access to and control over power and resources. Unequal access to common goods and rights might equally concern the interaction with institutions and the justice system. The situations of women and men also differ according to country, region, age, ethnic or social origin, economic circumstances or other factors.

Gender mainstreaming in urban security policies should take into account these differences when designing, implementing and evaluating activities or interventions, so that they benefit both women and men and do not increase inequality but enhance gender equality.

During this session, representatives of the partner cities of the project (Rotterdam, Lisbon, Nice, Stuttgart, Riga and Torino) will share their case-study and exchange with the expert Barbara Holtmann, Director, Fixed Africa, on the challenges they face, including such  questions:

• What does gender mainstreaming in urban security policies imply?
• How to integrate a gender perspective into an urban security initiative? Who should be involved?
• What tools facilitate gender mainstreaming?
• What are examples of successful gender mainstreaming in urban security?

✍️ Registration Form

Session 2

📆 28th February 2023 (10am CET) 

In times when unforeseen events and uncertainties have become the norm, local authorities are called upon to provide answers to complex problems in urban security with no obvious answers. It is therefore essential to make sure they are able to adapt quickly and, above all, to anticipate potential future challenges. By including a variety of perspectives, professions and experiences, the human-centred Design Thinking (DT) methodology enhances the co-production of concrete solutions, starting with a process of collaborative and multi-dimensional problem analysis, which helps to shed light on the whole picture of a given urban security challenge. This enables cities to engage local stakeholders and citizens in the design of interventions, and thus to tailor  solutions to the local context while responding to unmet needs of citizens. 

During this session, representatives of the partner cities of the project (Rotterdam, Lisbon, Nice, Stuttgart, Riga and Torino) will share their case-study and exchange with the expert Prof Kees Dorst, TD School, University of Technology Sydney, on the following questions:

• What is the Design Thinking methodology and how can it be used in urban security policies?
• How can this approach reframe urban security policy issues? How can it generate and test new solutions to old and emerging problems?
• How can Design Thinking improve the participation of citizens in urban security measures?
• What does Design Thinking look like in practice? Case studies and concrete examples of Design Thinking implementation in urban security

✍️ Registration Form

Session 3

📆 23 March 2023 (2pm CET) 

Public spaces are places for exchange, culture, trade, leisure and political expression, all activities that are at the heart of cities. In this sense, public spaces play an important role in strengthening social cohesion in a city or a neighbourhood. Conversely, when they are neglected or badly managed, they can generate more exclusion and marginalisation.

Public spaces are also an essential part of a city’s image and attractiveness. Different groups of people use them differently (young people vs. seniors, women vs. men…), which can create tensions among users and with local residents. Furthermore, because of their open nature and the fact that they attract crowds, public spaces can be targets for terrorism and criminal behaviour. 

Local and regional authorities are the level of government best placed to embed security in the design and management of such spaces in partnership with local communities. Indeed, experience shows that when citizens are involved in the life of their neighbourhood, including security, they feel a sense of belonging, attach more value to their own city, including local public spaces, and this in turn tends to reduce disorder and crime. Nevertheless, initiatives of citizen engagement are oftentimes adopted on an ad hoc basis and very much dependent on a particular situation rather than on a well designed local strategy.

During this session, representatives of the partner cities of the project (Rotterdam, Lisbon, Nice, Stuttgart, Riga and Torino) will share their case-study and exchange with the experts Thierry Charlois, Night Policy Project Manager, Paris City Council and Laetitia Wolff, Design Impact Consultant, Besign, The Sustainable Design School in Nice, on the following questions:

• What tools can facilitate citizen participation in the security and liveability of public spaces?
• What are examples of successful citizen engagement in maintaining public spaces safe and inclusive?
• How can local authorities promote and empower citizen initiatives without jeopardising the role of law enforcement or other security actors? 
• What criteria are needed to sustain citizen engagement over time (political, economic, communications…)? 

✍️ Registration Form

Session 4

📆 17 May 2023, (2pm CET) 

While most approaches to juvenile justice concentrate on punishing or treating delinquent youth, the restorative justice process seeks to repair the harm by involving the entire community in rehabilitating offenders and holding them accountable for their behaviour.

The current juvenile justice system in many countries relies heavily on costly and harmful incarceration and punitive probation. This punitive approach has poor outcomes, high recidivism, and little victim satisfaction. As an alternative, restorative justice is a flexible, participatory and problem-solving response to criminal behaviour, which can provide a complementary or an alternative path to justice. Indeed, the primary purpose of restorative justice is just that – to restore justice. Within families, schools, communities, organisations, civil society and the State, restorative justice provides peaceful conflict resolution and contributes to cohesive and democratic societies. 

During this session, representatives of the partner cities of the project (Rotterdam, Lisbon, Nice, Stuttgart, Riga and Torino) will share their case-study and exchange with the expert Tim Chapman, Chair of the board of the European Forum for Restorative Justice, on the following questions:

• What are the main restorative justice models that may be applied for juvenile delinquency cases? 
• What are the benefits of restorative justice for the judiciary system in juvenile delinquency cases, for adolescents and children as offenders, and for society?
• What are the requirements for a successful operation of restorative justice programmes for juvenile delinquency cases ? 

✍️ Registration Form

Session 5 (TBC)

📆 21 September 2023, (2pm CET) 

To be developed